
The ticking time bomb, the social media newsroom. courtesy of Steve Kayser
In a previous post I examined the traits of a good online newsroom, now it’s time to delve into the bad and ugly.
Award-winning business writer, Steve Kayser has a blog titled “Riffs, Tiffs, and What Ifs.” In his post on June 18, 2008 he did case studies on various social media newsrooms. He said that a lot of the ones he studied started out well then flopped. The reasons for this vary: too much work, no results after creation, risk, or not enough digital assets. The lack of digital assets is not valid excuse for not having a newsroom. As I mentioned in a previous post, there are templates to help the company to get started creating one. One of the newsrooms he mentioned was UK’s small PR consultancy firm, Wolfstar. Wolfstar’s online newsroom is almost three years old and the elements still lack completion.
One of the main elements that I’ve been pressing throughout several of my posts is the importance of having contacts in plain view. Wolfstar has the numbers at the top right of the page, however, there is no name of which those two numbers belong to and no e-mail address. In today’s digital world, not having an e-mail address as a prominent contact is inexcusable.
When it comes to finding out the details about Wolfstar, first the journalist must search for the link that takes them to the homepage. Turns out after several clicks around the page, the homepage link is embedded in the logo above the contact numbers. This is poor design because of the pages that link away from the homepage should at least, if not a consistent navigation bar, have a tab at the top or side of the page linking the journalist back to home. Journalists will probably become frustrated with the site after a few clicks ad no luck finding the homepage.
Getting updated information seems easy because there is a direct RSS icon to subscribe, but to subscribe by e-mail requires the user to click one step further. A one-click to an e-mail subscription is dangerous because the probability of the journalist taking the time to click then fill out their e-mail is slim. Companies have a better chance of keeping journalists updated if they make a fill in box for e-mail directly on the page. If a journalist subscribed to either the RSS of e-mail alert system, they probably haven’t received updates since January. The last “recent news” was dated as far back as January 23. For this reason, Wolfstar doesn’t not have a quality newsroom based on the lack of up-to-date news.
Let’s say a journalist is doing a story on the history of Wolfstar, what would he try to find on the newsroom besides what we’ve mentioned above? The journalist would start with backgrounders. Again, backgrounders share the company’s success, feature executive bios, and include standards on which the company builds from. Next they would look for archives. Surprise, surprise… Wolfstar actually has archives displayed on the newsroom page organized by month and year. However, there is no search box to browse the archives, let alone the newsroom page. This is a major pitfall for Wolfstar. HUGE no-no. With their lack of search function, they have a news tag cloud, which has no tags, so that feature is pointless. If it doesn’t work, delete it or find away to make it work. The only way to save the patient journalist at this point is the several categories, displayed under the archives, in which the archives are filed under.
The final feature Wolfstar does not use correctly is the photos. There are photos available to download via the good old fashioned, “right click, save as,” courtesy of the Mouse. Wolfstar is trying to be hip by being apart of the photo sharing social media Flickr, to feature photos highlighting the company. Here’s where they miss the point. Journalists don’t want photocopies of other journalist’s stories featuring Wolfstar, they want pictures of executive members or events put on by the company. Though the photos along with the online coverage section of the newsroom, shows they aren’t hurting for exposure, I feel several changes need to be made so it’s easy to understand why journalists should report about Wolfstar.
Wolfstar needs to step up to the plate and hire and expert, say from the Web Communications course at James Madison University, to redesign and reprioritize the content so it’s catered to the deadline driven journalists.